🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Movement

In Europe, a growing number of nations are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be passed next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban is "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to enact a law increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised parents to block their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is provided. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these services, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," said the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "based on conclusive data".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous social media material argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to create tools that are secure and fit for minors," commented a leading peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, regulation is primarily happening at the regional government level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from certain figures to follow Australia's path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Beyond these regions, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, international organizations adopt a more nuanced stance. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could backfire". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

Even as this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and others show that policymakers globally are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.